This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: OpenOffice 1.9.X and gcj
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 16:41 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> An access error like this is more likely to be PR 9369.
> This can be hacked around by making the constructor in question (if
> that is what it is) not `private'.
>
> Caolan, if you can confirm that this is the problem, I'll make an OOo
> meta-bug and link this to it.
Going around turning things that seem to cause trouble into public has
allowed me to make much more progress, so that seems like the problem
there alright.
I'm now using cvs head from a day or two ago rather than FC3's gcj to
get around the previous URL issue. Though with this version I've been
bitten a few times by seeming oddness with pre or post incremented
variables,
int foo = 0;
...
stuff[foo++] = new thingy
where stuff ends up as
stuff[0] = null;
stuff[1] = the thingy
whether this is restricted to where foo is a class member or not I'm not
sure, I just did a mass rejigging of lines that used the return of ++
operations to be seperate increment and assign and continued on my merry
way.
C.