This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Oh... That makes sense...But how is it less effective?When using classes one can use obfuscation/optimisation tools on class-files (e.g. progaurd) in order to reduce footprint, etc. Are there any similar possibilities with gcj?gcj can compile from class files to native but its less effective.
I reckon I cannot use progaurd since gcj cannot compile to native from class-files, right?!gcj can use more optimizations because class files provide much less informations for the compiler then java sources do.
Ok... I will try it and see which one makes the smaller footprint...But that is then the way to go - obfuscation on class-basis and then straight ahead?!I know no other way yet.
Regards, Martin
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |