This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Good point, I'd forgotten about those. I think if we are serious about having the compiler read .so's, however, these could be included in the metadata and just ignored by the runtime. The extra space when using pointer-free metadata shouldn't be too bad.Bryce> Having the compiler use it is an interesting idea, however - Bryce> the metadata is complete enough, so really its just down to some Bryce> design/technical challenges in having the compiler read from the Bryce> object files.
The compiled code doesn't have the deprecated tag, and perhaps won't have @Retention(CLASS) annotations either. (The new @Deprecated annotation seems to have @Retention(RUNTIME), which looks weird, but would let this work.) That's a barrier to directly using the .so in the compiler.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |