This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol

From: Sal <gcj at svf dot dreamhost dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:34:52 -0400
Subject: Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
References: <40DB2800.4080609@svf.dreamhost.com> <16603.16562.216596.966492@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <40DC6F22.7020007@svf.dreamhost.com> <16605.18424.511220.627244@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <40E036F8.2020106@svf.dreamhost.com> <16608.14125.892673.973228@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley wrote:

> > You want to load statically compiled classes that are already linked > > into an executable, but into a different class loader context? > > Yes, is this currently possible?

I doubt it.

Are there any plans to implement it? Or will it get taken care of under the new ABI?

- Sal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Sal
- GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Sal
- Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Sal
- Re: GCJ's URLClassloader and 'core' protocol
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]