This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Doc for autoconf and automake versions


>I also hope that libcpp and libstdc++-v3 can
>have their files regenerated with automake 1.8.5, as used for
>libgfortran, so that only one 1.8.x version is needed.

Done for libstdc++.

2004-06-14  Benjamin Kosnik  <bkoz@redhat.com>

	* Makefile.in: Regenerate with automake 1.8.5.
	* aclocal.m4: Same.
	* include/Makefile.in: Same.
	* libmath/Makefile.in: Same.
	* libsupc++/Makefile.in: Same.
	* po/Makefile.in: Same.
	* src/Makefile.in: Same.
	* testsuite/Makefile.in: Same.


>Where was the introduction of use of a third automake release series
>(1.8.x) without getting rid of at least one of the previous versions
>at the same time discussed?  Even during transitions, I think we
>should have no more than two versions of either autoconf or automake
>in use in the tree at once, and when a new bug-fix automake comes out
>(successive 1.8.x versions) the whole tree and documentation should be
>updated at once rather than having the versions diverge.

This would be preferred, but I think the continued migration upwards on
the 1.8.x automake versions is reflecting a desire to not get stuck on
any version, and instead track the current release. At least, that's how
I see it. 

If you are volunteering to keep everything in sync (perhaps by messages
such as this), I think it sounds like a great idea.

-benjamin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]