This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gdb with gcj

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Vladimir Leven <vladimirl at wrx-ca dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 11:40:58 -0400
Subject: Re: gdb with gcj
References: <40633001.3090605@wrx-ca.com> <408935D7.2060600@wrx-ca.com> <4092BD19.8060703@wrx-ca.com> <4092C034.4080804@redhat.com> <16531.43263.820716.740348@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On May 1, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:

The last time I investigated this, some of the optimizers (CSE?
loop?) were replacing one variable with another.  This doesn't change
the semantics of the program but the new variable is no longer marked
as a user variable and doesn't carry debug info.

Lets make sure there is a PR on this. We shouldn't have to recompile just to debug. There is something similar already for tree-ssa:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14638

Hopefully a solution for the tree-ssa issue will apply here as well.

Regards

Bryce.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gdb with gcj
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Re: gdb with gcj
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]