This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bytecode verifier

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:24:53 -0800
Subject: Re: Bytecode verifier
References: <1079384474.1995.85.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1079532074.29202.1033.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87oeqv49qc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <16472.41028.957290.280721@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <878yhz47lb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <406429F2.9090306@hotmail.com> <16484.15032.203346.632500@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Mar 26, 2004, at 06:14, Andrew Haley wrote:

libiberty is GPL; libgcj is GPL+exception.  There's no reason to to
link GPL code with GPL+exception code.


Actually libiberty is mixed with different licenses, it contains
GPL, GPL+exception and some files are in the public domain and
others are LGPL and some are in BSD and some are LGPL+exception.

Just some clarification,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bytecode verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Bytecode verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Bytecode verifier
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Bytecode verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: Bytecode verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]