This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libffi/i386 vs. -fno-pcc-struct-return

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: rittle at labs dot mot dot com
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:28:46 -0800
Subject: Re: libffi/i386 vs. -fno-pcc-struct-return
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <200401262243.i0QMhKLC047565@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <1075332974.3241.67.camel@escape> <200401290022.i0T0M2SE069746@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 16:22, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> I think it is easy to add a variant ABI which matches the FreeBSD/i386
> default (this is what I will attempt).  I think it is harder to track
> the flags (esp. since it appears no compile-time test detects it).

Ok - yes, I agree, especially if none of the other GCC libraries are
multilibbed on this compiler option.

Thanks!

AG

-- 
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.

References:
- libffi/i386 vs. -fno-pcc-struct-return
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: libffi/i386 vs. -fno-pcc-struct-return
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: libffi/i386 vs. -fno-pcc-struct-return
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]