This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK
- From: Mohan Embar <gnustuff at thisiscool dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>, Christopher Marshall <christopherlmarshall at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: Christopher Marshall <christopherlmarshall at yahoo dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com, per at bothner dot net, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:55:24 -0600
- Subject: Re: gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK
- Reply-to: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com
Hi Chris,
>I probably should have mentioned this before, when I was reading the thread, but someone referred
>to my test case as "contrived," since the lines were 1000 characters long. I take it the poster
>meant that in the real world such files would be far and few between.
>I suppose that is true for large parts of the real world, but I would also be surpised if it were
>not false for significant parts of it as well.
It was me who said that. Okay, I take it back.
Let me know if you need help applying this temporary patch and building a new binary for your
platform.
-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/