This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK

From: "C. Brian Jones" <cbj at gnu dot org>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>
Cc: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com, Christopher Marshall <christopherlmarshall at yahoo dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:07:09 -0500
Subject: Re: gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK
References: <YW3VKFIHSRZV76UOHEQOLHJEUTLKA72U.3fe8fbb6@p733> <7837F86A-3614-11D8-8B37-003065F97F7C@mckinlay.net.nz>
Reply-to: cbj at gnu dot org

On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 08:24, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2003, at 3:36 PM, Mohan Embar wrote:
> 
> >> Thanks Christopher, this is a useful test case. I suspect the problem
> >> here is our horribly inefficient implementation of
> >> BufferedReader.readLine(). 

Is it useful/possible to use gprof here to eliminate guess work?

Brian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- Re: gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK
  - From: Mohan Embar
- Re: gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]