This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: sigsegv?


Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Andrew> Uh yes, but the really interesting thing is what happens after this.
 > Andrew> Does it abort, or what?
 > 
 > Yes, it aborts.
 > 
 > Now I'm getting aborts from any old java program.
 > 
 > Does this ring a bell for anybody?
 > 
 > #0  0x42073771 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 > #1  0x420ebd8e in __unregister_atfork () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 > #2  0x42029fb8 in __cxa_finalize () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 > #3  0x4038ed55 in __do_global_dtors_aux ()
 >    from /home/tromey/gnu/Trunk/install/lib/libgcj.so.4
 > #4  0x406563a6 in _fini () from /home/tromey/gnu/Trunk/install/lib/libgcj.so.4
 > #5  0x4000ce44 in _dl_fini () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
 > #6  0x42029d40 in exit () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 > #7  0x08048bee in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfffedf4)
 >     at ../../../gcc/libjava/gij.cc:163
 > 
 > 
 > This is the result of just running "gij".
 > This is with a completely fresh build as of last night.  Nothing on
 > my machine has changed, it must be some new gcc bug.

I'm getting this too.

I didn't get it when I did my cast checkin a few days ago.

LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.17 does indeed fix the problem.

Jeff, how did you discover this?

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]