This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Eclipse vs gij/libgcj, unit-at-a-time, -O2 and -O

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:13:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Eclipse vs gij/libgcj, unit-at-a-time, -O2 and -O
References: <16294.55955.45026.90835@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.44.0311031750260.11349-100000@ops2.one-point.com>

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Mark Wielaard writes:
 > >  >
 > >  > Jeff said that there were already bug reports for inlining issues
 > >
 > > Which ones?  IMO these should be critical.
 > >
 > > I only see
 > >
 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11533
 > 
 > You found the one I was thinking of.  I thought "critical" was meant
 > for regressions... but I guess this is a regression if it is now
 > happening at -O2 (the PR mentioned -O3).

Well, I'm not sure how an inlining problem can happen at -O2.

However, a failure in the tree inliner that worked with the RTL
inliner is IMO a regression.

Andrew.

References:
- Eclipse vs gij/libgcj, unit-at-a-time, -O2 and -O
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Eclipse vs gij/libgcj, unit-at-a-time, -O2 and -O
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]