This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Java stack trace vs. the PLT
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Java <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:01:53 -0800
- Subject: Re: Java stack trace vs. the PLT
- References: <CF78512A-0DAA-11D8-AFD5-003065F97F7C@mckinlay.net.nz>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:07:08PM +1300, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> Is there anything we can do to ensure that ncode always gets resolved
> by the linker to the actual address of the function, and not a PLT
> indirection?
Not that I know of. The compiler will be generating a direct
32/64-bit relocation. The linker will notice that the symbol
resolves to a function and create the PLT entry.
r~