This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Anyone else sees a bootstrap failure (Linux-x86)?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:42:10PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> This is more or less what I would expect, BTW:
>
> cuddles:~/docs $ time gcc -c /cuddles/aph/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c
>
> real 0m30.297s
> user 0m29.760s
> sys 0m0.230s
> cuddles:~/docs $ time gcc -c /cuddles/aph/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -pipe
>
> real 0m30.356s
> user 0m29.790s
> sys 0m0.200s
Here I get this:
mkoch@obelix:~$ time gcc -c
src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c
real 1m12.438s
user 1m9.960s
sys 0m0.260s
mkoch@obelix:~$ time gcc -c
src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -pipe
real 1m6.666s
user 1m6.430s
sys 0m0.230s
Thats a gain of around 6% (user time). Normal Linux x86 laptop setup, no
special about /tmp.
BTW: Celeron 1000, 224 MB of RAM
Michael