This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Anyone else sees a bootstrap failure (Linux-x86)?


On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:42:10PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> This is more or less what I would expect, BTW:
> 
> cuddles:~/docs $ time gcc -c /cuddles/aph/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c 
> 
> real    0m30.297s
> user    0m29.760s
> sys     0m0.230s
> cuddles:~/docs $ time gcc -c /cuddles/aph/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -pipe
> 
> real    0m30.356s
> user    0m29.790s
> sys     0m0.200s

Here I get this:

mkoch@obelix:~$ time gcc -c
src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c

real    1m12.438s
user    1m9.960s
sys     0m0.260s
mkoch@obelix:~$ time gcc -c
src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -pipe

real    1m6.666s
user    1m6.430s
sys     0m0.230s

Thats a gain of around 6% (user time). Normal Linux x86 laptop setup, no
special about /tmp.

BTW: Celeron 1000, 224 MB of RAM


Michael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]