This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

3.4 versus 3.3 executable size on win32


I just compiled exactly the same source tree on win32 one time with 3.3 and one time
with 3.4. The resulting 3.4 executable is much larger than the resulting
3.3 executable.

I've used link options: -s -Os.

I am comparing gcc33-20030802 versus gcc34-20031006 (from thisiscool).

Is there a reason why 3.4 produces substantially larger executables than 3.3 on
win32?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]