This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi all, On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:33, Roger Sayle wrote: > > Thanks for the test case. Looking at it I can immediately guess what > the problem is: the evaluation order of operands to binary operators. > A quick check of section 15.7.1 of the Java language specification > reveals that the semantics are indeed different from C and C++s which > allow side-effecting operands to be evaluated in arbitrary order. > > I'm currently working on a patch [...] FYI. I just tried a new checkout of gcc which contains Roger his latest (workaround) patch for this issue. gnu-crypto compiles out of the box with this and make check gives 0 failures. Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |