This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
But my main worry isn't how to store the pointer, but the fact that all RawData pointers are the same type; you have even less type safety than C++. I suppose if you have a rule that all access to RawData must be private then this issue will rarely arise.
That has always been my assumption - RawData pointers must not escape out to untrusted client code, and should as a general rule only be used for private fields and parameters/results of private methods. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |