This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: 100x? (Was: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html)
- From: Anthony Jones <ajones at clear dot net dot nz>
- To: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, Erik Poupaert <erik dot poupaert at skynet dot be>,ajones at clear dot net dot nz, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:42:10 +1200
- Subject: Re: 100x? (Was: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html)
- Reply-to: ajones at clear dot net dot nz
>On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 02:51, Erik Poupaert wrote:
>> http://irate.sourceforge.net/index.html
>>
>> 22 July 2003 - Problems with the server have been sorted. The server has
been running
>> as a gcj compiled binary. I've switched to Sun's Java VM and it's running
about 100
>> times faster. I suspect that the problem is garbage collection.
>
>This looks like a cool app. A quick look at their Makefile shows that
>they're building the server with no optimization. But 100 times seems
>excessive! Perhaps Anthony Jones can give us a little more data...
Anthony,
I think the problem is garbage collection (memory size). I didn't mean to suggest
that there was anything wrong with gcj compiler. I'm very impressed with it.
I just changed back to the Sun VM because it was easier than sorting out the
actual problem, which I expect is a matter of configuration.
100 is an exaggeration. It was taking 9 minutes to start up the server and now
it takes 20 seconds or so.
Anthony