This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

100x? (Was: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html)

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: Erik Poupaert <erik dot poupaert at skynet dot be>, ajones at clear dot net dot nz
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 27 Jul 2003 08:12:11 -0700
Subject: 100x? (Was: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html)
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <20030708111157.39603182.erik.poupaert@skynet.be> <87k7atf6uf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030708185957.63f682d1.erik.poupaert@skynet.be> <87r84dj6ux.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030727095146.2520de51.erik.poupaert@skynet.be>

On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 02:51, Erik Poupaert wrote:
> http://irate.sourceforge.net/index.html
> 
> 22 July 2003 - Problems with the server have been sorted. The server has been running
> as a gcj compiled binary. I've switched to Sun's Java VM and it's running about 100
> times faster. I suspect that the problem is garbage collection.

This looks like a cool app.  A quick look at their Makefile shows that
they're building the server with no optimization.  But 100 times seems
excessive!  Perhaps Anthony Jones can give us a little more data...

AG

-- 
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.

References:
- http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html
  - From: Erik Poupaert
- Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html
  - From: Erik Poupaert
- Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/done.html
  - From: Erik Poupaert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]