Re: gcc-3.3 and statically linked mingw binaries?

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > >  > > Mohan> I don't have any ideas, but didn't you allude to this here?:
 > >  > > Mohan> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-04/msg00180.html
 > >  > >
 > >  > > I re-read this.  I think it would make sense to add selected locale
 > >  > > classes to FirstThread.java, to make static linking work a little
 > >  > > better.  We can just add the minimal set.
 > >
 > > I would have thought it would make more sense to put this stuff in a
 > > special file that only gets lined when linking statically.  In
 > > addition, users could add classes to this file without recompiling
 > > libgcj.
 > 
 > However we do it, we have a request to link Output_ASCII in 3.3, which
 > closes tomorrow...

Right, but there's no reason not to kludge 3.3 while doing something
better on the trunk.

Andrew.