This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

installing GCJ 3.3 and deploying executables constructed with it

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Erik Poupaert <erik dot poupaert at skynet dot be>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:08:54 +0100
Subject: installing GCJ 3.3 and deploying executables constructed with it
References: <05RPWQYSR95D0AGAD9ICFBRLJ41HF.3f0b9633@p733><87wuerhcds.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><m1d6giol8x.fsf@nowhere.com><16141.10683.226105.700885@cuddles.redhat.com><20030710113130.4e51e03d.erik.poupaert@skynet.be>

A few odd things:

It's perhaps a mistake to hard-code
http://mirrors.rcn.net/pub/sourceware/gcc/releases/gcc-3.3; there will
doubtless be a 3.3.1 with bug fixes.

Why do "make bootstrap" and "make"?  

You assume bash.
"you should modify your .bash_profile configuration"  Who says they use
bash?

A user only really needs to install a new compiler as root if they
intend others to use it.  

If you only need to run executables, it is sufficient to define the
SOnames that appear in the output of "ldd".  It shouldn't be necessary
to provide additional symlinks.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: installing GCJ 3.3 and deploying executables constructed withit
  - From: Erik Poupaert

References:
- Re: gcc-3.3 and statically linked mingw binaries?
  - From: Mohan Embar
- Re: gcc-3.3 and statically linked mingw binaries?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: gcc-3.3 and statically linked mingw binaries?
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: gcc-3.3 and statically linked mingw binaries?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- installing GCJ 3.3 and deploying executables constructed with it
  - From: Erik Poupaert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]