This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Unreviewed patch
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, joern dot rennecke at superh dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, GCC Hackers <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 12 Jun 2003 08:15:20 -0600
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch
- References: <200306121332.h5CDWGJ10519@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "kaz" == kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> writes:
kaz> libffi sh64-*-linux* support:
kaz> <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg02321.html>
As you've discovered, libffi is a bit under maintained. I'm not
really the person to do it -- I'd do little more than rubber stamp
patches that come in. I'm happy to do that, though, in the absence of
a better process. Hopefully some more qualified person out there will
speak up (and we'll end up with a libffi entry in MAINTAINERS).
I believe we've agreed in the past that port maintainers can make
port-specific libffi changes. So I think you can check in your fix on
that basis.
Tom