This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -shared option

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Ranjit Mathew" <rmathew at hotmail dot com>, "Steve Ni" <list at boyi-online dot com>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 01 Apr 2003 15:51:55 -0700
Subject: Re: -shared option
References: <006701c2f7f7$e7d390a0$5623030a@d2lv11x><OE46V0hCLwHc9ny7BXx0000030e@hotmail.com><16009.24738.953085.939999@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com> writes:

Andrew> I don't see why we need to do anything that does not
Andrew> correspond to Java semantics.  In other words, symbols
Andrew> described as public should be exported, and
Andrew> private/protected/package private ones should not.

I think protected symbols would have to be exported, wouldn't they?
One DLL might have a class whose superclass is in a different DLL.
Package private ones are debatable.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -shared option
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- -shared option
  - From: Steve Ni
- Re: -shared option
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: -shared option
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]