This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Status page
- From: "Andreas Tobler" <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
- To: "Andrew Haley" <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:33:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: Status page
>-- Original Message --
> >
> > How do we call the darwin port? Nearly ready? Soon ready?
>
>Fairly seriously busted, but may survive given some Tender Loving Care.
>:-)
;-)
>Looking at your test results, the interpreter seems to be in the worst
>shape, although CNI looks like it also needs attention. Fixing libffi
>would move this port into almost full health, I reckon.
Let it say this way, the interpreter was much worse a few weeks ago. I still
try to improve. And to fix libffi where I can.
CNI is 'broken' since the testsuite wants shared objects which we don't
support yet on darwin. If this is addressed I expect a major reduction of
the failures.
Regarding the interpreter, I'm confused since it also bombs in the area
of boehm-gc. And then the Throw_2 does not werk because of the 0 pointer
exception pointed out by Jeff in a recent email.
The FileHandleGcTest is kind of lotto, sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't.
The Thread_Monitor works when I launch it by hand ?
I continue.
Andreas