This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: gnu.java.locale
- From: "Erik Poupaert" <erik dot poupaert at chello dot be>
- To: <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:14:02 +0100
- Subject: RE: gnu.java.locale
>>>> I like that you're doing this, since it means it will be harder for us
>>>> to introduce bugs here. But isn't adding references like this just
>>>> part of the price of static linking?
Maybe you're right. I've got to do the same thing anyway, when using a jdbc
driver for example:
private static Class x=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver.class;
...
Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
Otherwise they don't work either. I guess I will have to resort to creating
a StaticLinking.java class in my projects, in which I regroup all hard
references.
I just don't have a complete list of classes that could be affected. I know
from experience that java.util.Calendar and java.util.Date are affected. Do
you know what other libjava classes are affected as well?