This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: making static linkage useful (oh the horror!)

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 16 Jan 2003 02:32:05 -0800
Subject: Re: making static linkage useful (oh the horror!)
Organization: Myself
References: <POEIJGMGPFPGFHAGKFHAGEKECDAA.erik.poupaert@chello.be> <86wul9gbuc.fsf@nowhere.com> <15906.38487.796813.768347@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <86heccvxf3.fsf@nowhere.com> <15907.60527.637520.105566@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <86wul7wixl.fsf@nowhere.com> <15908.31523.157278.406895@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <86of6jwfrb.fsf@nowhere.com> <15908.38989.828342.856790@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <864r8bw7pj.fsf@nowhere.com> <15909.10410.500719.543688@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <86smvu1bw4.fsf@nowhere.com> <15909.55417.463957.119265@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <863cntj0mb.fsf_-_@nowhere.com> <15910.31421.641767.407391@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> I am in favour of a static linkage mechanism that is not broken.

This is selective, creative redefinition of the word "broken".

The -fno-bounds-check option "breaks" gcj by deviating from the JLS,
yet we still allow it.  I want static compilation to have the same
status and be treated the same way as -fno-bounds-check.

Why is -fno-bounds-check okay, but not-fully-JLS-compliant static
linkage isn't?

  - a

Follow-Ups:
- Re: making static linkage useful (oh the horror!)
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- RE: Size problem
  - From: Erik Poupaert
- I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Adam Megacz
- I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I can make your gcj-compiled binaries much smaller.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- making static linkage useful (oh the horror!)
  - From: Adam Megacz
- making static linkage useful (oh the horror!)
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]