This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Size problem, compilation performance and dll hell


Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com> writes:
> Here is one advantage with .so/.dlls: reduced compilation time
> with many .exe files.

I've always been a proponent of using a (late-binding) interpreter for
development and then using a compiler for the final release.  Not
caring about how long compiles take allows compiler writers to
implement a *lot* more optimizations (for example, whole-program
optimizations).  I really don't think that "it increases compile time"
is ever a very compelling argument -- you should only need to invoke
the compiler once per release of your software.

Personally, I develop on javac/hotspot and then use gcj for the final
production build of XWT.

  - a


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]