This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj darwin test results for 3.3

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:33:50 +0100
Subject: Re: gcj darwin test results for 3.3
References: <3DEE86F6000037A6@mail02.agrinet.ch> <15902.44169.973906.286080@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley wrote:

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andreas=5FTobler?= writes:
 > Hi,
 >  > and here the results for 3.3.
 >  > Looks promising :)
 >  > Andreas
 >  >                 === libjava Summary ===
 >  > # of expected passes            2769
 > # of unexpected failures        71

Getting better.

Would it make send to post the sum and /the log file to find out on what I should concentrate first? If so, to whom should I send?

Now I think it makes sense to start investigating what's going wrong on certain TC's. Before I wasn't sure if it was expect/kerenl or the TC itself.

Thanks,
Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcj darwin test results for 3.3
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- gcj darwin test results for 3.3
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- gcj darwin test results for 3.3
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]