This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcj does pretty darned well... (was: Re: GCC and Fortran eat...)
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Terry Sikes <tsikes at cox dot net>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 03 Jan 2003 17:27:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: gcj does pretty darned well... (was: Re: GCC and Fortran eat...)
- References: <3E15E858.8080806@cox.net>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Terry" == Terry Sikes <tsikes@cox.net> writes:
Terry> BTW, I did open a bug report in the JCP for the 2x slowdown the
Terry> Sun & IBM JDKs experienced on this code going from 1.3 to
Terry> 1.4...PLEASE don't let gcj emulate those two packages in that
Terry> regard!
Don't worry. I think 3.3 generally has better performance than 3.2.
I imagine 3.4 will be even better.
Terry> The author still hasn't updated his page to show a run with
Terry> similar gcj settings on his P4...perhaps a bit more prodding is
Terry> in order?
Feel free to ping him. CC the list if you like.
Terry> There are a whole lot of folk on Slashdot with the wrong
Terry> impression...
Yeah, that's unfortunate. I've taken to ignoring SlashDot. Perhaps
it is better to respond with facts, but it is also time consuming
given the volume of misconception.
Tom