This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, vinny at klomp dot org, Erwin Bolwidt <erwin at klomp dot org>
Date: 31 Dec 2002 01:08:48 -0700
Subject: Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
References: <1040605813.760.55.camel@elsschot><1040614353.16983.66.camel@escape> <1040616449.16986.76.camel@escape><1040691492.6675.24.camel@elsschot><1040692861.16983.255.camel@escape><1040721048.12113.22.camel@elsschot>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

Mark> Artur Biesiadowski has some real patches to reduce memory use in
Mark> java.util.zip. But I am using the attached hacks which already make
Mark> Eclipse reasonable usable on my 1.4Ghz machine

The ZipFile patch seems pretty reasonable to me.  I haven't read
Artur's patch yet.  I assume it includes the equivalent.  Putting
something like this in the tree sooner rather than later (i.e., no
need to wait for a full review of Artur's entire patch) would be
useful.

Tom

References:
- eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]