This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, classpath at gnu dot org, vinny at klomp dot org, erwin at klomp dot org
Date: 29 Dec 2002 23:16:33 -0700
Subject: Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
References: <1040605813.760.55.camel@elsschot><1040614353.16983.66.camel@escape> <1040616449.16986.76.camel@escape><1040691492.6675.24.camel@elsschot>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

Mark> We must cache the result of Runtime.(internal)loadLibrary()
Mark> somewhere.

I think that makes sense.  Or do we need to support the case of
Class.forName() failing, then the user copies a .so to the right
place, and then Class.forName() is tried again?  (Maybe we just need a
cache that can handle that.)

Could you submit a PR for this?

Tom

References:
- eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: eclipse status (summary: it looks nice)
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]