This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libjava testresults (Was: basic-improvements call for testers)
- From: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Dec 2002 13:15:49 +0100
- Subject: Re: libjava testresults (Was: basic-improvements call for testers)
- Organization:
- References: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20021216121524.GA8359@elsschot> <1040055972.16026.560.camel@elsschot>
Hi,
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 17:26, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 13:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi (java@gcc.gnu.org added to the CC),
> > [...]
> But please note the posting from Jerry Quinn "3.4 bib failed to
> bootstrap java on ppc" on the main gcc mailinglist:
> [...]
> That probably means that my autobuilder on ppc which tests libgcj
> against the Mauve testsuite will probably die as soon as the bib branch
> is merged into mainline :(
It wasn't that dramatic. The bib-branch was merged into mainline and the
testresults are still produced (and posted to gcc-testresults). I had
forgotten that it doesn't do a full bootstrap but only a simple make
using the isntalled gcc 2.95. The machine doesn't have enough diskspace
to do a full bootstrap for two gcc versions.
It seems that both the libjava and the mauve testsuite don't have any
regressions which is good news.
The machine is now doing a normal 3.3 branch build and testrun. When
that finishes I will setup the machine to do a full bootstrap of the
mainline and then of the 3.3 branch. I just have to make sure that there
is enough disk space which means that removing each build before
starting the new one. I will report the results when that is done.
Cheers,
Mark