This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Backtrace is broken without -g

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 06 Sep 2002 13:35:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Backtrace is broken without -g
References: <15736.64703.666337.104769@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><3D790139.7030608@bothner.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

Andrew> Do we need to make libgcj compatible with java binaries
Andrew> compiled with an earlier compiler?

Per> In my opinion: Not yet.

I agree.

I don't see how we can promise binary compatibility before finishing
Bryce's java-style binary compatibility work.  I think this is the
logical consequence of the facts that Java binary compatibility is
different from what we implement now and that Sun can and does add new
methods and such with every release.

Tom

References:
- Backtrace is broken without -g
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Backtrace is broken without -g
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]