This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: who's been mucking with EXEEXT?
- From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Aug 2002 21:38:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: who's been mucking with EXEEXT?
- Organization: Myself
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208272351160.31429-100000@ops2.one-point.com>
Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> The 2nd definition applies to non-canadian crosses.
>From the name, that would seem to be the case. However, in real life,
a non-canadian cross is using the canadian definition. Any idea why
this is?
> Anyway, am I incorrect saying that gcjh is a host utility but EXEEXT
> is a target setting?
You are correct.
> And even for win32 hosts, $(EXEEXT) need not be present in this
> macro to find gcjh?
I believe that htis is incorrect.
On cygwin, I think you can omit .exe, but on mingw ("real windows")
you definately cannot. However, the gcc in CVS can't be built to run
on a mingw host (there's a giganto-patch for 2.96 out there), so this
is probably a non-issue.
> 2002-08-27 Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
>
> * Makefile.am (ZIP, GCJH): Remove $(EXEEXT).
This works; can you please check it in?
- a
--
"Cassette tapes are killing the music industry" -- RIAA spokesperson, 1978