This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: 'thread stack pointer out of range'?
- From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
- To: "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 25 Jun 2002 14:16:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: 'thread stack pointer out of range'?
- Organization: Myself
- References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BF44F@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
[[ regarding Win32 API calls that use SP for stuff other than the ]]
[[ stack pointer -- this confuses the GC ]]
"Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
> I'm open to suggestions as to what to do here. My impression was
> that the issue is mostly with third-party (not necessarily
> Microsoft) libraries that decide to use the stack pointer as a
> temporary register for the duration of some inner loop.
I can confirm that this occurs when linking only against GDI32,
WSOCK32, WS2_32, and COMDLG32, all part of Microsoft Windows. This is
on Win98, by the way. I've posted to discuss@xwt.org to see if anybody
has seen it on NT derivitaves; I will report back when I hear from the
users.
> You could try to give up and restart it if you don't like the pc
> value. But I'm not sure how you recognize that the pc is in a
> hand-coded routine that might mess with the sp.
Could we assume that any PC outside the .exe's image is unsafe? In
other words, never GC if any thread is in a DLL? This is probably
overly conservative, but I can't think of anything else.
> Can you look at the failure case with a debugger?
Sadly I cannot get the error to happen -- it has only happened to me
about ten or twenty times during the last five months of heavy
development and testing of XWT.
> and that the wrapped routines can't block.
That's going to be a problem -- this error is most common during XWT's
startup phase, when it's downloading from the net. This leads me to
believe that it may be the socket read()/write() routines that are
doing this.
- a
--
Sick of HTML user interfaces?
www.xwt.org
"disappointing retail sales figures suggest to some that America's love
affair with retail therapy may be over." -- _The Economist_, 19-Jun