This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
testsuite problem: warning: `-no-install' is ignored for i686-pc-cygwin
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- To: <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:49:09 +1000
- Subject: testsuite problem: warning: `-no-install' is ignored for i686-pc-cygwin
Following up on my cygwin testsuite post, the compilation tests
fail because libtool issues warnings
libtool: link: warning: `-no-install' is ignored for i686-pc-cygwin
libtool: link: warning: assuming `-no-fast-install' instead
A nasty work around is to patch libtool, like so
$ diff -u libtool.orig libtool
--- libtool.orig Fri May 3 10:26:28 2002
+++ libtool Fri May 3 10:28:22 2002
@@ -1772,8 +1772,8 @@
*-*-cygwin* | *-*-mingw* | *-*-pw32* | *-*-os2*)
# The PATH hackery in wrapper scripts is required on Windows
# in order for the loader to find any dlls it needs.
- $echo "$modename: warning: \`-no-install' is ignored for $host" 1>&2
- $echo "$modename: warning: assuming \`-no-fast-install' instead" 1>&2
+ #$echo "$modename: warning: \`-no-install' is ignored for $host" 1>&2
+ #$echo "$modename: warning: assuming \`-no-fast-install' instead" 1>&2
fast_install=no
;;
*) no_install=yes ;;
It would be better to fix the testsuite flags. Ideas welcome.
With this in place, you see the problem with executable filenames,
which is fixed by my libjava.exp patch sent to java-patches@