This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)''

From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
To: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
Cc: jakub at redhat dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:40:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)''
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
References: <200204241809.g3OI9gJ15955@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <20020426092948.D32482@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <200204262248.g3QMmX340100@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
Reply-to: obrien at FreeBSD dot org

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 05:48:33PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> platform.  I have no idea how widespread this problem is/was; for some
> reason libtool insists upon incrementally building libjava.so (to work
> around perceived command line length limitations even though the
> entire unbroken command line seems to run fine on this platform).

Interested in making a libtool patch to stop doing that? :-)

References:
- Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)''
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)''
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)''
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]