This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: -R gcc option?
- From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Cc: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, Carlos Pereira <carlos at pehoe dot civil dot ist dot utl dot pt>, gcc at gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Apr 2002 00:11:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: -R gcc option?
- References: <200204111824.TAA04590@pehoe.civil.ist.utl.pt><20020411152809.A28097@disaster.basement.lan><1018567237.1817.343.camel@dhcppc2> <3CB62B5E.7000004@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 17:33, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> Yes, we should change GCJ's "-R" and also "-D" flags to something else,
> to avoid conflicting with the existing gcc options.
I can understand -R, but gcc's existing -R option really needs to be
documented somewhere (or am I just not seeing it?).
I don't think I agree about -D. I don't see how it can conflict with
the C/C++ version of -D. It's also compatible with javac, no?
AG