This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: -R gcc option?
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- To: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, Carlos Pereira <carlos at pehoe dot civil dot ist dot utl dot pt>, gcc at gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:33:34 +1200
- Subject: Re: -R gcc option?
- References: <200204111824.TAA04590@pehoe.civil.ist.utl.pt> <20020411152809.A28097@disaster.basement.lan> <1018567237.1817.343.camel@dhcppc2>
Anthony Green wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:28, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
>>>Does current gcc supports, plans to support
>>>the -R/path/lib directives, as in Sun Operating
>>>Systems?
>>>
>>It already does, when you use gcc on a Sun system.
>>
>
>Hmm... this doesn't appear to be documented, while gcj does have a
>documented -R option...
>
>@item -R @var{resource-name}
>This option is used to tell @command{gcj} to compile the contents of a
>given file to object code so it may be accessed at runtime with the core
>protocol handler as @var{core:/resource-name}.
>
>I guess this is a problem.
>
Yes, we should change GCJ's "-R" and also "-D" flags to something else,
to avoid conflicting with the existing gcc options.
regards
Bryce.