Re: gij and -cp/-classpath

[Nic Ferrier <nferrier at tapsellferrier dot co dot uk>]

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes: 
>  
> Andrew> Would you accept a patch for this? 
>  
> Yes, definitely. 
>  
> Andrew> Also would some give an hit of how to do it? 
>  
> At one point Nic was revamping the argument processing, but I don't 
> know the status of this. 

I did write an argument parser and an implementation of gij based on
the argument parser. I never submitted it because there wasn't enough
enthusiasm for it.

The GCJ folks mainly seem to be interested in a change to the
CNI/JNI invocation API. I refocussed my efforts on that but haven't
had time to come up with a definitive patch (I am still hoping to do
that however).


Nic