java archive
date index for April, 2002

This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2002
16:09 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
15:26 Cygwin port patches for GCC 3.1 are posted Jerome Marc
14:28 Re: Cygwin port : it runs ! Brian Jones
14:14 Re: Cygwin port : it runs ! Jerome Marc
14:10 Re: Cygwin port : it runs ! Jerome Marc
13:41 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:41 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:37 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
12:28 Re: Cygwin port : it runs ! Anthony Green
11:59 Re: Cygwin port : it runs ! Eric Blake
11:42 Cygwin port : it runs ! Jerome Marc
11:17 Re: --resource problems (Was: tomcat jsp compilation status?) Anthony Green
10:02 Re: --resource problems (Was: tomcat jsp compilation status?) Tom Tromey
10:00 Re: GCJ 3.1: will generated code run on almost all versions of Windows? Tom Tromey
09:45 Re: GCJ 3.1: will generated code run on almost all versions of Windows? Adam King
08:50 --resource problems (Was: tomcat jsp compilation status?) Anthony Green
08:13 Re: GCJ 3.1: will generated code run on almost all versions ofWindows? Anthony Green
06:37 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
02:37 GCJ 3.1: will generated code run on almost all versions of Windows? Jocelyn Paine
01:17 Cygwin port Jerome Marc
00:22 TLtest failures in gcc-3.1 Christian Jönsson

April 29, 2002
13:14 Re: outputting iso-8859-1 chars Tom Tromey
08:25 Re: Problem with AClass.class Tom Tromey
08:02 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots law
02:13 Re: Problem with AClass.class Ryszard Kabatek
01:10 Re: Problem with AClass.class Bryce McKinlay

April 28, 2002
23:24 Re: Problem with AClass.class Ryszard Kabatek
08:23 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots law

April 27, 2002
23:31 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
23:30 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
18:38 Re: cygwin port Tom Tromey
14:02 cygwin port Jerome Marc
11:45 Re: libltdl Tom Tromey
11:44 Re: Cygwin port Tom Tromey
11:03 libltdl Mark Mitchell
09:32 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots John David Anglin
08:21 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots law
04:44 Cygwin port Jerome Marc
02:45 Mailman results for Redhat-install-list redhat-install-list-request
02:23 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-26 Array_3 testsuite failure on sparc32-linux Bryce McKinlay

April 26, 2002
23:46 gcc-3.1 2002-04-26 Array_3 testsuite failure on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
18:59 RE: Gcj build instructions Boehm, Hans
18:08 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots John David Anglin
15:52 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Jakub Jelinek
15:48 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
14:42 SPECjbb vs. 3.1 status Boehm, Hans
13:34 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots law
13:08 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots John David Anglin
11:41 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots Mark Mitchell
10:09 RE: I need help with gc Boehm, Hans
08:39 Re: Problem with AClass.class Tom Tromey
05:03 Re: Problem with AClass.class Ryszard Kabatek
04:59 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots Jason Merrill
04:51 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
04:45 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots Jason Merrill
04:19 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
04:15 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots Jason Merrill
03:53 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
03:43 Re: Exception causing insns in delay slots Jason Merrill
03:00 Re: Problem with AClass.class Bryce McKinlay
01:55 I need help with gc Martin Kahlert
00:30 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Jakub Jelinek
00:09 Problem with AClass.class Ryszard Kabatek
00:00 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Richard Henderson

April 25, 2002
23:44 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
21:41 Re: dwarf2 signal unwind problem David S. Miller
21:40 Exception causing insns in delay slots David S. Miller
21:31 RE: dwarf2 signal unwind problem Boehm, Hans
20:25 dwarf2 signal unwind problem David S. Miller
03:49 Re: outputting iso-8859-1 chars Morten Poulsen
03:03 Re: outputting iso-8859-1 chars Oskar Liljeblad
02:00 SPECjbb X86 validation failures Andrew Haley
01:26 Re: outputting iso-8859-1 chars Morten Poulsen

April 24, 2002
22:48 SPECjbb X86 validation failures Boehm, Hans
15:56 Re: outputting iso-8859-1 chars Tom Tromey
14:34 outputting iso-8859-1 chars Morten Poulsen
11:27 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Richard Henderson
11:09 Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
10:29 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
10:27 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
10:07 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alexandre Petit-Bianco
09:27 Re: request branch patch approval: libgcj stack traces fromreflection data (required for Win32) Mark Mitchell
09:00 Re: request branch patch approval: libgcj stack traces from reflection data (required for Win32) Tom Tromey
08:55 Re: request branch patch approval: libgcj stack traces fromreflection data (required for Win32) Mark Mitchell
08:42 Re: backtrace() for Win32 Mark Mitchell
07:54 Re: Report about -static failing when libgcj.a built with GNU ar Loren James Rittle
06:20 RE: Report about -static failing when libgcj.a built with GNU ar Jan Mikkelsen
00:16 Report about -static failing when libgcj.a built with GNU ar Loren James Rittle

April 23, 2002
22:42 Re: request branch patch approval: libgcj stack traces from reflection data (required for Win32) Bryce McKinlay
22:29 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Bryce McKinlay
21:36 Re: Attention GCJ devel team James Williams
20:15 request branch patch approval: libgcj stack traces from reflection data (required for Win32) Adam Megacz
18:57 Re: backtrace() for Win32 Tom Tromey
18:54 Re: -D ? Tom Tromey
18:04 backtrace() for Win32 Adam Megacz
16:59 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Bryce McKinlay
16:55 Re: -D ? Bryce McKinlay
16:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
14:56 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
14:39 Re: why isn't --with-threads=posix the default for linux? Tom Tromey
14:39 Re: critical Java regression Tom Tromey
14:36 Re: -D ? Tom Tromey
14:21 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
09:38 security providers and ... Vladimir Puskas
07:25 -D ? akos.szalay
05:46 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Oskar Liljeblad

April 22, 2002
21:26 finding the bottom of the stack Adam Megacz
20:45 Re: critical Java regression Per Bothner
18:48 why isn't --with-threads=posix the default for linux? Adam Megacz
17:29 RE: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava on irix Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:21 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava on irix Bryce McKinlay
17:15 3.1 bootstrap failure in libjava on irix Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:26 Re: critical Java regression Mark Wielaard
15:56 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Bryce McKinlay
14:10 Re: [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's? Tom Tromey
14:07 Re: critical Java regression Per Bothner
13:55 critical Java regression Per Bothner
13:53 Re: [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's? Jeff Sturm
12:42 gdb -vs- Java strings Tom Tromey
11:42 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Adam Megacz
11:26 [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's? Matthias Klose
11:10 Re: Some notes on our status Alexandre Petit-Bianco
11:03 Re: Some notes on our status Tom Tromey
01:27 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Raif S. Naffah
00:22 Re: Attention GCJ devel team James Williams

April 21, 2002
23:17 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Nic Ferrier
22:22 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Martin Kahlert
20:54 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Bryce McKinlay
20:48 Re: Some notes on our status Anthony Green
20:30 Re: xerces not building with 3.1 branch? Anthony Green
17:59 Re: interfaces and sub-class implementations Bryce McKinlay
16:54 interfaces and sub-class implementations Nic Ferrier
16:14 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Bryce McKinlay
08:54 Re: Some notes on our status Mark Wielaard
08:25 xerces not building with 3.1 branch? Anthony Green
07:41 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Adam Megacz
07:38 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware [java/6393] Adam Megacz
07:23 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Adam Megacz
07:21 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Adam Megacz

April 20, 2002
14:08 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Bryce McKinlay
13:15 Re: Some notes on our status Jeff Sturm
10:22 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Tom Tromey
06:05 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
00:21 Re: Some notes on our status Bryce McKinlay

April 19, 2002
23:52 Re: Some notes on our status Per Bothner
23:16 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNInot aware Bryce McKinlay
19:59 Some notes on our status Tom Tromey
18:20 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Tom Tromey
18:18 Re: bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Tom Tromey
18:05 bug: extra four bytes between super/sub instance images, CNI not aware Adam Megacz
17:18 Re: Mauve - the remainder Tom Tromey
17:10 Re: serious(?) glibc backtrace() problem on IA64 Tom Tromey
17:02 Re: Gcj build instructions Tom Tromey
15:45 Re: Mauve - the remainder (ieee_real_to_integer) Mark Wielaard
11:54 Re: java.lang.Thread.start() doesn't work? Anthony Green
11:30 Gcj build instructions Boehm, Hans
11:06 Re: java.lang.Thread.start() doesn't work? Tom Tromey
11:04 Re: Error when trying to run java program with gij Tom Tromey
09:16 Re: java.lang.Thread.start() doesn't work? Lars Andersen
07:39 Re: java.lang.Thread.start() doesn't work? Anthony Green
07:33 java.lang.Thread.start() doesn't work? Andrew Haley
07:20 java.lang.Thread.start() doesn't work? Lars Andersen
01:13 Re: Error when trying to run java program with gij Per-Olof Wallin

April 18, 2002
15:06 Re: Error when trying to run java program with gij Tom Tromey
08:31 Error when trying to run java program with gij Per-Olof Wallin
01:15 Mauve - the remainder Andrew Haley

April 17, 2002
17:36 RE: serious(?) glibc backtrace() problem on IA64 Boehm, Hans
16:24 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Bryce McKinlay
16:07 Re: Mauve - the remainder Mark Wielaard
15:54 MY PLEA FOR ASSISTANCE Thabo Moloto
15:02 Mauve - the remainder Mark Wielaard
14:28 Re: ICEs on X86/Linux with SPECjbb Adam King
14:12 ICEs on X86/Linux with SPECjbb Boehm, Hans
13:00 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Loren James Rittle
10:54 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
10:19 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
09:46 RE: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Boehm, Hans
01:52 serious(?) glibc backtrace() problem on IA64 Andrew Haley
01:05 Re: Java: Fix for PR 6294 Alexandre Petit-Bianco
00:28 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
00:22 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson

April 16, 2002
16:33 serious(?) glibc backtrace() problem on IA64 Boehm, Hans
09:04 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Tom Tromey
08:58 Re: Bug in configure.in David S. Miller
08:54 Re: real_zerop thinks -0 == 0 Mark Wielaard
08:49 Re: walking the stack Tom Tromey
08:47 Re: Bug in configure.in Tom Tromey
08:01 Re: real_zerop thinks -0 == 0 Tom Tromey
07:01 Bug in configure.in Martin Kahlert
03:42 Re: walking the stack Andrew Haley
03:31 Re: walking the stack Brian Jones

April 15, 2002
23:08 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
22:02 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
20:45 Re: walking the stack Bryce McKinlay
20:03 Re: walking the stack Adam Megacz
19:59 RE: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Boehm, Hans
18:45 Re: walking the stack Bryce McKinlay
18:45 Re: walking the stack Bryce McKinlay
18:22 Re: walking the stack Bryce McKinlay
16:49 real_zerop thinks -0 == 0 Mark Wielaard
16:14 Java: Fix for PR 6294 Bryce McKinlay
13:23 Re: -R gcc option? Tom Tromey
10:59 Re: walking the stack Anthony Green
10:49 Re: walking the stack Anthony Green
09:51 Re: walking the stack Adam Megacz
03:01 walking the stack Andrew Haley
02:59 walking the stack Andrew Haley
01:37 Re: walking the stack Bryce McKinlay
00:13 walking the stack Anthony Green

April 14, 2002
13:16 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson

April 12, 2002
21:30 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Tom Tromey
20:59 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Bryce McKinlay
10:32 Re: -R gcc option? Phil Edwards
01:34 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Loren James Rittle
00:35 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Bryce McKinlay

April 11, 2002
23:54 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Loren James Rittle
23:45 Re: -R gcc option? Bryce McKinlay
23:33 Re: -R gcc option? Per Bothner
23:13 Re: -R gcc option? Anthony Green
20:57 Re: apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist [okay to add new ctor to ConcreteProcess?] Adam Megacz
18:20 Re: misc java-related gdb patches Daniel Jacobowitz
18:13 Re: misc java-related gdb patches Per Bothner
17:36 Re: -R gcc option? Bryce McKinlay
17:28 Re: Java debugger Bryce McKinlay
15:53 Re: Java debugger Nic Ferrier
15:39 Java debugger Adam King
15:20 Re: -R gcc option? Anthony Green
14:25 Re: apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist [okay to add new ctor to ConcreteProcess?] Tom Tromey
12:55 Re: misc java-related gdb patches Daniel Jacobowitz
12:52 misc java-related gdb patches Per Bothner
10:57 Re: apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist [okay to add new ctor to ConcreteProcess?] Adam Megacz
10:39 Re: apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist Adam King
07:44 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz

April 10, 2002
20:17 Re: compiling to native: simple q Bryce McKinlay
19:51 compiling to native: simple q Nic Ferrier
18:21 PowerPC Java bootstrap failure Bryce McKinlay
16:35 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Per Bothner
16:11 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Tom Tromey
15:56 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Tom Tromey
12:55 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Eric Blake
12:25 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Adam Megacz
12:21 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Eric Blake
11:11 RE: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Boehm, Hans
10:49 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Mark Wielaard
10:42 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Tom Tromey
10:31 Re: MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Adam Megacz
10:14 MissingResourceException with Date under mingw port Adam King
09:47 Re: C++: __java_double expressions promote to float Andrew Haley
09:45 Re: C++: __java_double expressions promote to float Jason Merrill
07:16 Re: C++: __java_double expressions promote to float Andrew Haley
06:45 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
06:13 Committed --extdirs change to 3.1 branch Anthony Green
05:17 Re: C++: __java_double expressions promote to float Jason Merrill
01:20 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
00:20 Re: C++: __java_double expressions promote to float Mark Mitchell

April 09, 2002
23:39 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Mark Wielaard
18:19 RE: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Boehm, Hans
18:13 Re: gij and -cp/-classpath Bryce McKinlay
18:05 RE: __java_double expressions promote to float Boehm, Hans
18:00 Re: gij and -cp/-classpath Nic Ferrier
17:57 Re: gij and -cp/-classpath Bryce McKinlay
17:50 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Bryce McKinlay
17:32 Re: apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist Brian Jones
17:01 Re: gij and -cp/-classpath Nic Ferrier
15:36 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
15:35 Re: apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist Tom Tromey
15:29 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure David S. Miller
15:24 apologies, 3.1, mingw wishlist Adam Megacz
15:02 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
14:46 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Tom Tromey
14:41 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Tom Tromey
14:30 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Tom Tromey
12:59 Re: Another gcj article Tom Tromey
12:55 Re: gij and -cp/-classpath Tom Tromey
11:30 gij and -cp/-classpath Andrew Pinski
11:15 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Loren James Rittle
10:51 C++: __java_double expressions promote to float Andrew Haley
10:30 Re: Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64 Tom Tromey
10:01 Re: Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64 Per Bothner
09:48 RE: Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64 Andrew Haley
09:43 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
09:43 RE: Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64 Boehm, Hans
09:37 Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64 Andrew Haley
09:33 Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64 Boehm, Hans
08:25 Another gcj article Joerg Brunsmann
06:13 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
06:11 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
05:00 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Bryce McKinlay
01:36 Re: libjava exception fix was:Re: incorrect? link order for mingwgcj Andreas Tobler
00:49 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Loren James Rittle

April 08, 2002
17:31 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Bryce McKinlay
15:20 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Mark Wielaard
14:56 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Boehm, Hans
14:41 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Mark Wielaard
14:27 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Mark Wielaard
14:08 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
13:43 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Tom Tromey
13:41 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER (solved) Tom Tromey
13:40 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER (solved) Tom Tromey
13:33 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Tom Tromey
13:32 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Boehm, Hans
13:25 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Tom Tromey
13:24 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
13:18 Re: libjava exception fix was:Re: incorrect? link order for mingw gcj Adam Megacz
13:17 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Tom Tromey
13:15 Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
13:14 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Tom Tromey
13:02 Re: Java floating-point mess Robert Dewar
07:48 Re: Java floating-point mess Tom Tromey
02:04 libjava exception fix was:Re: incorrect? link order for mingw gcj Andreas Tobler

April 07, 2002
22:32 Re: Java patch: Re: gcj producing bad code Alexandre Petit-Bianco
14:31 Re: Updated the GCJ manual on the branch Tom Tromey

April 06, 2002
19:34 Java patch: Re: gcj producing bad code Bryce McKinlay
17:39 Re: gcj producing bad code Bryce McKinlay
15:47 Re: gcj producing bad code Per Bothner
15:37 Re: gcj producing bad code Nic Ferrier
08:22 Structural modification definition (Was: Analysis of Mauve failures- Part 2) Mark Wielaard
07:55 Re: gcj producing bad code Eric Blake
06:33 Re: gcj producing bad code Nic Ferrier

April 05, 2002
22:10 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Bryce McKinlay
21:58 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch aking
21:37 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Bryce McKinlay
20:21 Re: incorrect? link order for mingw gcj Adam Megacz
20:20 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Adam Megacz
18:51 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Bryce McKinlay
18:33 Re: gcj producing bad code Bryce McKinlay
18:28 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Bryce McKinlay
16:49 RE: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Boehm, Hans
15:29 Re: gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Loren James Rittle
14:42 gcj producing bad code Nic Ferrier
12:37 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Adam Megacz
12:16 gcj and UDP datagrams under freebsd Mark Allman
11:41 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Per Bothner
11:37 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Per Bothner
11:35 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Boehm, Hans
10:19 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Andrew Haley
10:01 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Andrew Haley
09:50 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Jeff Sturm
09:29 Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
09:27 gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux? Christian Jönsson
09:27 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Boehm, Hans
08:30 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Andrew Haley
08:02 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Mark Wielaard
07:57 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Jeff Sturm
07:08 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Andrew Haley
07:02 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Frank Jacobs
06:20 Re: Java floating-point mess Robert Dewar
04:22 Updated the GCJ manual on the branch Nic Ferrier
04:07 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Mark Wielaard
03:47 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Andrew Haley
03:13 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Mark Wielaard
01:15 Re: Java floating-point mess Andrew Haley
01:07 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Andrew Haley

April 04, 2002
20:39 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
20:07 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
17:14 Re: Bug libgcj/1442 Change Character implementation Bryce McKinlay
17:10 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Mark Wielaard
17:04 Re: incorrect? link order for mingw gcj Bryce McKinlay
16:45 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
16:40 RE: Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Boehm, Hans
16:21 Bug libgcj/1442 Change Character implementation Mark Wielaard
15:32 Re: Mauve on Solaris 2.8 Mark Wielaard
14:21 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Adam Megacz
14:20 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Adam Megacz
13:11 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
12:57 Re: Java floating-point mess Zack Weinberg
12:27 Re: java aliasing rules Andrew Haley
10:57 Re: Mauve on Solaris 2.8 Andrew Haley
10:44 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
10:43 Re: Mauve on Solaris 2.8 Andrew Haley
10:35 Re: Mauve on Solaris 2.8 Andrew Haley
08:53 Re: Mauve on Solaris 2.8 Mark Wielaard
08:38 Mauve on Solaris 2.8 Andrew Haley
07:27 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
07:14 Analysis of Mauve failures - The final chapter Mark Wielaard
05:32 incorrect? link order for mingw gcj aking

April 03, 2002
19:36 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Bryce McKinlay
15:56 Re: anonymous constructor extension Alexandre Petit-Bianco
15:31 anonymous constructor extension Nic Ferrier
14:53 Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 3 Mark Wielaard
12:14 Re: Out of town Anthony Green
11:27 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch aking
11:13 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Andrew Haley
11:07 Java with Fortran - possible with GCJ ? Andrew Haley
10:38 Java with Fortran - possible with GCJ ? James Adams
10:23 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Frank Jacobs
09:09 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
08:33 Re: Solaris 2.8 build Gerald Pfeifer
07:34 Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2 Mark Wielaard
04:34 Status report of libjava on *-*-freebsd[45]* Loren James Rittle
03:33 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER (solved) Göran Thyni
01:23 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER (solved) Martin Kahlert

April 02, 2002
22:44 Re: debug output problem in ObjectInputStream Bryce McKinlay
21:19 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 1 Bryce McKinlay
21:17 Re: [Kde-java] GCJ and qtjava/kdejava Bryce McKinlay
21:08 Re: qtjava and GCJ update Bryce McKinlay
21:00 qtjava and GCJ update Bryce McKinlay
20:38 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 1 Brian Jones
19:04 Out of town Tom Tromey
18:53 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Tom Tromey
18:49 Re: Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update Tom Tromey
18:47 Re: gnu/gcj/io/shs.cc doesn't compile on Solaris 2.5.1 (bootstrap failure) Tom Tromey
18:38 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 1 Tom Tromey
18:36 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 1 Tom Tromey
18:17 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
17:42 Re: debug output problem in ObjectInputStream Warren Levy
17:38 Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 1 Eric Blake
17:15 Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 1 Mark Wielaard
14:49 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
14:45 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
14:34 Re: Solaris 2.8 build Tom Tromey
14:17 Re: debug output problem in ObjectInputStream Tom Tromey
14:15 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
13:30 debug output problem in ObjectInputStream Per Bothner
13:25 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER Tom Tromey
12:55 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER Tom Tromey
12:12 [Fwd: breakage in darwin] Andreas Tobler
10:53 Re: mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch Adam Megacz
06:32 libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
05:48 mingw32 gcj compile failure and possible patch aking
01:44 Re: [Kde-java] GCJ and qtjava/kdejava Richard Dale
00:35 Re: Another 646 patch and performance comparison with TOWER Martin Kahlert

April 01, 2002
17:01 Re: [Kde-java] GCJ and qtjava/kdejava Bryce McKinlay
08:53 RE: GC failure w/ THREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC ? Boehm, Hans
08:14 Re: GC failure w/ THREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC ? Michael Smith
06:14 Re: [Kde-java] GCJ and qtjava/kdejava Richard Dale


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.3