This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rhug failure on alpha

From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>,Java Discuss List <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:28:47 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: rhug failure on alpha
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10203181626500.3732-100000@mars.deadcafe.org><877ko92au2.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > 
 > Debugging shows that we are indeed generating the bit field operation
 > in fold_truthop().  I doubt I'll be fixing this for 3.1.
 > 
 > One fix might be to simply teach gcj how to undo the bit field
 > optimizations.  This would be a workaround.

This sounds rather frightening.

Andrew.

References:
- Re: rhug failure on alpha
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: rhug failure on alpha
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]