This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rhug failure on alpha

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Java Discuss List <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 18 Mar 2002 11:56:38 -0700
Subject: Re: rhug failure on alpha
References: <87vgbubcai.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10203181020360.24199-100000@mars.deadcafe.org> <15510.7998.25101.495726@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> I've seen this happen before, but not for some time.

Me too.

Andrew> I remember looking at this and coming to the conclusion that
Andrew> we really need a fold() with Java semantics.  I think it would
Andrew> be a deal simpler than the C/C++ version.

Yeah.  I came to this conclusion once, too, after looking at a bunch
of Jacks tests.

Tom

References:
- rhug failure on alpha
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: rhug failure on alpha
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: rhug failure on alpha
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]