This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
- From: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 03 Mar 2002 13:03:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10202281926230.30980-100000@mars.deadcafe.org> <87it8hrslg.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <86vgch3xs9.fsf@megacz.com> <3C7EDB02.4010300@bothner.com> <87y9hcrjvm.fsf@creche.redhat.com><3C7F1564.A73FC17B@email.byu.edu> <3C7F2E31.5060100@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Hi,
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 08:30, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> The cool thing about GCJ is that there arn't any bootstrapping issues
> for JITs written in Java. Come to think of it, I wonder why Tom wrote
> the verifier in C++ ;-)
OK, I will show my ignorance. Is there actually a real reason that the
verifier is written in C++. I see the smiley but don't know how to
interpret it in this situation. Having a verifier written in java would
be a very nice thing since then we could integrate it with ClassLoader
so other VMs don't have to implement their own verification.
Cheers,
Mark