This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
- From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
- To: Goran Thyni <goran at kirra dot net>
- Cc: tech at freenetproject dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Feb 2002 12:29:57 -0800
- Subject: Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
- Organization: Myself
- References: <20020221022416.GG231@znex> <20020222010936.GJ231@znex> <20020222125306.GA8575@amphibian.dyndns.org> <200202242208.g1OM82k28365@sentinel.bobich.ne\t> <20020225083912.GC668@kirra.net> <86664lpiwj.fsf@megacz.com> <20020225200702.GB669@kirra.net>
Goran Thyni <goran@kirra.net> writes:
> It is more a question of syntax not handled by gcj at the moment.
What syntax does GCJ not handle?
> A way around syntax problems is to just compile .class files
> generate by jikes/javac with gcj. But this is no fun debugging.
I personally don't use GCJ for debugging -- I get my code 100%
working/debugged/tested under HotSpot, and then recompile with GCJ for
deployment. VM's and interpreters will probably always provide a
better debugging environment than static compilers.
- a
--
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
Mechanism'." --lynx_user_abroad
Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com