This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>, Nic Ferrier <nferrier at tapsellferrier dot co dot uk>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 25 Feb 2002 03:17:02 -0300
Subject: Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <orit8m43ft.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><Pine.LNX.4.10.10202250019250.26667-100000@mars.deadcafe.org><20020225010454.A27334@disaster.basement.lan>

On Feb 25, 2002, Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> wrote:

> I agree here; it seems we spend more time undoing libtool's abstraction
> than libtool spends adding it.  :-)

Do you really mean this?  I'd like to know of such situations, in
which you had to undo libtool's abstraction.  That's pretty sad.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]