This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:48:51 +1300
Subject: Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
References: <1014104684.7611.10.camel@oak.uwyn.office> <87d6z11ioa.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <86y9hodnis.fsf_-_@megacz.com> <878z9oklgj.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <86eljfoksf.fsf@megacz.com>

Adam Megacz wrote:

>Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>I'm ok with the idea in principle.  I'm a bit concerned about making
>>this change for 3.1, since I don't know what the risks might be.
>>
>
>What's the timetable for 3.1?
>

http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html

regards

Bryce.

References:
- Reducing static binary size
  - From: Geert Bevin
- Re: Reducing static binary size
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
  - From: Adam Megacz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]