java archive
author index for February, 2002

This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Christian Jönsson

• 2002-02-22 23:05 Failed to complete testsuite run in gcc-3.0.4/libjava

Göran Thyni

• 2002-02-25 00:39 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-26 00:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Adam Megacz

• 2002-02-01 00:20 why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj?
• 2002-02-01 01:07 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-01 15:32 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-01 15:33 Re: jc1 segfaults?
• 2002-02-01 15:36 Re: jc1 segfaults?
• 2002-02-01 15:40 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj?
• 2002-02-01 16:21 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-01 16:22 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision?
• 2002-02-01 17:25 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-02 15:25 crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit?
• 2002-02-02 15:40 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-02 15:43 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? [even stranger]
• 2002-02-02 17:48 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? [even stranger]
• 2002-02-04 12:10 jvm wishes and gripes
• 2002-02-04 14:36 Re: jvm wishes and gripes
• 2002-02-04 15:14 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc?
• 2002-02-04 16:25 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc?
• 2002-02-06 11:13 Re: mingw port and Wine?
• 2002-02-07 22:49 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc?
• 2002-02-11 18:23 timeval == POSIX == nonportable
• 2002-02-12 22:05 jc1 segfaults, please help
• 2002-02-13 19:10 gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-13 22:52 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-20 10:25 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
• 2002-02-20 14:28 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
• 2002-02-24 14:50 proper .emacs for gcc code?
• 2002-02-25 09:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 09:40 WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-25 11:13 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 12:35 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 12:42 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 13:30 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-25 18:20 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-25 18:21 Fatal error, aborting. load average of 15 is too high
• 2002-02-25 19:30 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-25 19:36 catching exceptions in main() causes segfault?
• 2002-02-25 19:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-27 11:01 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-27 11:46 Re: What to do about java.version?
• 2002-02-27 11:50 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-27 15:13 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-27 17:18 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-27 19:37 bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-27 20:23 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-28 14:38 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-28 14:42 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 16:56 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-28 17:03 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 17:08 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 22:38 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Albert Chin

• 2002-02-27 19:54 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

Alexandre Oliva

• 2002-02-08 16:32 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-08 19:34 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-11 23:24 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-15 08:09 Re: java.lang.StrictMath
• 2002-02-22 13:31 Re: build failure on darwin
• 2002-02-24 19:39 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-24 19:59 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-24 22:17 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-25 05:34 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-25 08:32 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-25 08:54 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-27 15:42 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-27 17:51 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-27 18:02 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-27 18:33 Re: Installing libjava fails
• 2002-02-28 01:43 Re: Installing libjava fails

Alexandre Petit-Bianco

• 2002-02-10 14:03 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision?
• 2002-02-20 12:39 Re: patch in handling of finit$
• 2002-02-28 16:13 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 16:45 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check

Andreas Schwab

• 2002-02-28 01:39 Re: Installing libjava fails

Andreas Tobler

• 2002-02-06 12:01 darwin and java status
• 2002-02-06 13:20 testsuite question
• 2002-02-06 13:36 Re: testsuite question
• 2002-02-07 01:50 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 02:27 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 02:48 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 03:20 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 10:33 sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-07 23:11 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 23:13 Re: testsuite question
• 2002-02-07 23:17 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-07 23:18 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-08 12:11 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-09 08:37 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix
• 2002-02-10 06:58 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix
• 2002-02-10 12:56 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix
• 2002-02-22 10:10 build failure on darwin
• 2002-02-22 13:29 Re: build failure on darwin
• 2002-02-22 13:35 Re: build failure on darwin

Andrew Haley

• 2002-02-01 05:55 why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj?
• 2002-02-01 10:08 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj?
• 2002-02-07 02:00 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-08 06:00 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-15 02:06 Re: java.lang.StrictMath
• 2002-02-15 05:59 DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 06:04 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 08:23 Re: java.lang.StrictMath
• 2002-02-15 10:11 gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B
• 2002-02-19 03:10 Reducing static binary size
• 2002-02-25 01:57 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code?
• 2002-02-26 10:23 RE: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-27 12:17 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-27 12:18 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 00:57 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 02:49 classloader info in stacktrace

Andrew Pinski

• 2002-02-06 13:27 Re: testsuite question
• 2002-02-19 11:01 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code

Anthony Green

• 2002-02-05 19:18 mingw port and Wine?
• 2002-02-06 12:07 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-13 10:54 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help
• 2002-02-13 20:26 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-21 17:49 Linux Magazine article
• 2002-02-24 12:18 What to do about java.version?
• 2002-02-26 13:16 Re: What to do about java.version?
• 2002-02-28 14:30 Re: proposed java install and extensions directory change

Antonio Ake

• 2002-02-15 13:38 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2002-02-11 14:43 RE: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-25 14:39 RE: gcj build failure
• 2002-02-27 14:51 java testsuite results from irix 6.5
• 2002-02-27 18:53 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5
• 2002-02-27 20:20 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5

Boehm, Hans

• 2002-02-12 09:51 RE: Thread local allocation
• 2002-02-13 09:06 RE: Thread local allocation
• 2002-02-19 09:27 RE: Reducing static binary size
• 2002-02-26 10:09 RE: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-27 18:24 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5
• 2002-02-28 09:45 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5

Brian Jones

• 2002-02-02 20:22 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-15 12:03 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-16 07:41 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-24 18:16 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-25 10:56 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Bryce McKinlay

• 2002-02-01 14:23 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-01 16:56 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-02 15:59 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit?
• 2002-02-02 16:00 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? [even stranger]
• 2002-02-04 14:05 Re: nio package and asynchronous io
• 2002-02-04 16:15 Re: jvm wishes and gripes
• 2002-02-04 16:21 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc?
• 2002-02-07 02:43 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 03:03 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 03:04 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 15:55 Re: compile problem
• 2002-02-07 16:58 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-07 17:48 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work
• 2002-02-07 18:18 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-07 18:21 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work
• 2002-02-11 14:01 Re: DNS JNDI provider and java.nio
• 2002-02-11 18:42 Re: timeval == POSIX == nonportable
• 2002-02-11 20:28 Thread local allocation
• 2002-02-12 18:51 Re: Thread local allocation
• 2002-02-13 02:29 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help
• 2002-02-13 02:38 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris
• 2002-02-13 19:25 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-14 23:02 Re: java.lang.StrictMath
• 2002-02-14 23:58 Re: java.lang.StrictMath
• 2002-02-15 21:31 Re: Datagrams - Permission Denied Error
• 2002-02-16 13:00 Re: Link java object files into cpp app
• 2002-02-17 00:27 Why copy Utf8Consts?
• 2002-02-17 23:31 Patch: Re: Datagram Problems
• 2002-02-18 12:54 Re: CNI from apache module
• 2002-02-19 15:03 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code
• 2002-02-20 15:49 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
• 2002-02-21 16:33 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-22 12:58 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-24 01:34 Makefile problems
• 2002-02-24 16:05 Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-24 19:45 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-25 15:01 Re: gcj build failure
• 2002-02-25 15:22 Re: jar installation standards
• 2002-02-25 15:27 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4?
• 2002-02-25 15:34 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-26 16:18 Re: Fatal error, aborting. load average of 15 is too high
• 2002-02-26 16:27 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-27 17:07 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 01:09 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-28 15:21 New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 16:05 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-28 16:08 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 16:08 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 16:18 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 23:31 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

C Santosh Kumar

• 2002-02-28 01:39 classloader info in stacktrace

Cedric Berger

• 2002-02-04 10:59 Re: nio package and asynchronous io
• 2002-02-04 12:37 Re: jvm wishes and gripes
• 2002-02-08 00:59 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work

David Edelsohn

• 2002-02-07 18:37 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-08 10:41 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-08 14:21 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-08 15:17 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000

Eric Blake

• 2002-02-23 01:39 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-25 08:06 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code?
• 2002-02-28 21:58 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Geert Bevin

• 2002-02-18 23:46 Reducing static binary size

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2002-02-11 12:08 java/contribute.html (was: Status of Bugzilla?)

Glenn A. McAllister

• 2002-02-22 08:10 Re: Linux Magazine article

Goran Thyni

• 2002-02-25 12:07 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Jeff Sturm

• 2002-02-08 06:52 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris
• 2002-02-15 12:01 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B
• 2002-02-15 13:27 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B
• 2002-02-18 02:15 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris
• 2002-02-19 11:13 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code
• 2002-02-22 19:09 Re: Linux Magazine article
• 2002-02-24 21:46 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-25 08:01 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-25 09:14 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-26 06:42 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-26 07:57 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-26 08:27 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-26 17:45 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-26 17:57 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-27 15:40 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-27 19:58 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions
• 2002-02-28 08:04 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-28 15:52 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 15:55 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 16:33 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 17:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Joe Buck

• 2002-02-08 15:10 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000

John Leuner

• 2002-02-22 03:32 Re: Rmi compilation to native code

Kevin A. Burton

• 2002-02-04 13:58 Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

Lars Andersen

• 2002-02-16 07:48 Link java object files into cpp app
• 2002-02-18 02:22 CNI from apache module

Mark Mitchell

• 2002-02-13 10:56 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help

Mark Wielaard

• 2002-02-03 08:28 Status of workaround for bug #4715 (Prevents compiling Classpathwith 3.1)
• 2002-02-22 10:42 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-23 01:30 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-25 12:51 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 13:04 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Martin Kahlert

• 2002-02-07 05:37 Bug with JNI on Solaris (wrong function address?)
• 2002-02-08 04:04 Bugs for JNI on Solaris
• 2002-02-08 05:44 Another endianess problem on Solaris
• 2002-02-13 02:25 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris
• 2002-02-22 08:05 jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-25 05:02 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-25 23:45 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-26 07:00 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
• 2002-02-28 05:49 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?

Martyn Honeyford

• 2002-02-07 03:46 GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-08 02:02 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000

Matthew Bemis

• 2002-02-05 06:26 missing java file
• 2002-02-05 13:32 Re: missing java file

Nic Ferrier

• 2002-02-01 02:32 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-02 03:33 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-04 10:50 Re: nio package and asynchronous io
• 2002-02-07 11:25 compile problem
• 2002-02-07 13:05 Re: compile problem
• 2002-02-07 15:29 refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work
• 2002-02-07 18:02 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work
• 2002-02-07 20:13 initialization (again)
• 2002-02-08 04:59 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work
• 2002-02-15 06:02 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 07:38 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 11:14 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-20 04:46 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code
• 2002-02-24 10:58 Re: Makefile problems
• 2002-02-25 13:14 Re: jar installation standards
• 2002-02-26 11:39 Re: jar installation standards

Pedro

• 2002-02-25 10:38 gcj build failure
• 2002-02-25 14:18 Re: gcj build failure
• 2002-02-25 14:56 RE: gcj build failure

Per Bothner

• 2002-02-01 09:39 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision?
• 2002-02-02 23:08 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-04 12:37 Re: jvm wishes and gripes
• 2002-02-17 00:36 Re: Why copy Utf8Consts?
• 2002-02-18 00:53 PATCH handling of Java builtins; fixes super bytecode calls
• 2002-02-18 10:08 Re: CNI from apache module
• 2002-02-20 12:03 patch in handling of finit$
• 2002-02-20 12:58 Re: patch in handling of finit$
• 2002-02-21 18:06 Re: Linux Magazine article
• 2002-02-22 16:01 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance
• 2002-02-24 12:37 Re: What to do about java.version?
• 2002-02-25 12:46 jar installation standards
• 2002-02-26 11:21 Re: jar installation standards
• 2002-02-26 11:51 Re: jar installation standards
• 2002-02-27 14:36 Re: What to do about java.version?
• 2002-02-28 11:51 proposed java install and extensions directory change
• 2002-02-28 14:46 Re: proposed java install and extensions directory change
• 2002-02-28 17:35 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Pete Chown

• 2002-02-11 13:22 DNS JNDI provider and java.nio
• 2002-02-15 04:38 DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 06:06 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 06:07 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-16 06:18 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-16 06:23 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-19 09:40 Problems merging DNS JNDI code
• 2002-02-20 04:21 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code

Phil Edwards

• 2002-02-24 19:31 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-24 22:05 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-24 22:24 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

Philip Goisman

• 2002-02-08 13:23 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-08 14:16 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-12 13:22 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-15 08:55 gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B
• 2002-02-15 12:26 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B
• 2002-02-15 13:50 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B
• 2002-02-25 08:01 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5

Rainer Orth

• 2002-02-08 14:03 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-11 10:40 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-12 06:56 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5

Richard Henderson

• 2002-02-01 09:19 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj?
• 2002-02-01 10:10 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj?
• 2002-02-25 16:43 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-25 16:56 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-26 18:41 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
• 2002-02-26 21:59 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

Rodrigo Augusto Barbato Ferreira

• 2002-02-07 10:12 Re: Bug with JNI on Solaris (wrong function address?)

Santosh Cheler

• 2002-02-28 01:55 classloader info in stacktrace

shudo

• 2002-02-08 01:55 Re: sqrt interpreter Q

Suman Sai

• 2002-02-15 19:23 Datagrams - Permission Denied Error
• 2002-02-17 21:23 Datagram Problems

Tom Tromey

• 2002-02-01 22:49 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-01 23:32 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl
• 2002-02-01 23:51 Two natFile.cc questions
• 2002-02-05 13:11 Re: Status of workaround for bug #4715 (Prevents compiling Classpath with 3.1)
• 2002-02-05 13:13 Re: missing java file
• 2002-02-07 09:53 Re: Bug with JNI on Solaris (wrong function address?)
• 2002-02-07 11:35 Re: compile problem
• 2002-02-07 16:47 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-07 17:34 Re: compile problem
• 2002-02-07 17:50 Re: Many libjava testsuite failures on Solaris/SPARC and Intel
• 2002-02-07 17:54 Re: darwin and java status
• 2002-02-07 17:57 Re: testsuite question
• 2002-02-07 18:04 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-07 20:01 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-07 20:18 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-07 20:33 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision?
• 2002-02-07 20:39 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc?
• 2002-02-08 05:51 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-08 05:57 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-08 06:07 Re: Bugs for JNI on Solaris
• 2002-02-08 12:02 Re: sqrt interpreter Q
• 2002-02-08 15:08 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000
• 2002-02-08 18:45 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-02-10 10:25 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix
• 2002-02-11 19:13 Re: timeval == POSIX == nonportable
• 2002-02-13 09:28 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help
• 2002-02-14 23:23 Re: java.lang.StrictMath
• 2002-02-15 11:02 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-15 11:04 Re: DNS JNDI provider
• 2002-02-17 21:13 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris
• 2002-02-19 09:08 Re: Reducing static binary size
• 2002-02-19 11:42 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code
• 2002-02-20 07:01 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code
• 2002-02-20 10:57 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?']
• 2002-02-20 11:27 Re: PATCH handling of Java builtins; fixes super bytecode calls
• 2002-02-22 07:17 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-22 14:54 Re: Linux Magazine article
• 2002-02-22 14:55 Re: Rmi compilation to native code
• 2002-02-24 16:44 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code?
• 2002-02-25 07:52 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code?
• 2002-02-25 07:55 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 09:56 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 12:26 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 12:38 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-25 13:44 Re: gcj build failure
• 2002-02-25 14:25 Re: gcj build failure
• 2002-02-25 15:44 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-26 08:44 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
• 2002-02-26 08:46 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-26 16:31 Re: Fatal error, aborting. load average of 15 is too high
• 2002-02-26 21:42 Re: What to do about java.version?
• 2002-02-28 16:08 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 16:54 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features
• 2002-02-28 19:59 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check
• 2002-02-28 20:02 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Tuomas Leikola

• 2002-02-01 04:40 Re: Native compilation article

u_a1bargnesi

• 2002-02-21 16:00 Rmi compilation to native code

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)