java archive
date index for February, 2002

This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2002
23:31 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Bryce McKinlay
22:38 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
21:58 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Eric Blake
20:02 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
19:59 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Tom Tromey
17:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Jeff Sturm
17:35 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Per Bothner
17:08 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
17:03 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
16:56 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions Adam Megacz
16:54 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
16:45 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Alexandre Petit-Bianco
16:33 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Jeff Sturm
16:18 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Bryce McKinlay
16:13 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Alexandre Petit-Bianco
16:08 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Bryce McKinlay
16:08 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Tom Tromey
16:08 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Bryce McKinlay
16:05 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions Bryce McKinlay
15:55 Re: New gcj option --no-store-check Jeff Sturm
15:52 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Jeff Sturm
15:21 New gcj option --no-store-check Bryce McKinlay
14:46 Re: proposed java install and extensions directory change Per Bothner
14:42 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
14:38 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions Adam Megacz
14:30 Re: proposed java install and extensions directory change Anthony Green
11:51 proposed java install and extensions directory change Per Bothner
09:45 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5 Boehm, Hans
08:04 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Jeff Sturm
05:49 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Martin Kahlert
02:49 classloader info in stacktrace Andrew Haley
01:55 classloader info in stacktrace Santosh Cheler
01:43 Re: Installing libjava fails Alexandre Oliva
01:39 Re: Installing libjava fails Andreas Schwab
01:39 classloader info in stacktrace C Santosh Kumar
01:09 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions Bryce McKinlay
00:57 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Andrew Haley

February 27, 2002
20:23 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions Adam Megacz
20:20 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:58 Re: bad news re: mingw exceptions Jeff Sturm
19:54 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Albert Chin
19:37 bad news re: mingw exceptions Adam Megacz
18:53 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
18:33 Re: Installing libjava fails Alexandre Oliva
18:24 RE: java testsuite results from irix 6.5 Boehm, Hans
18:02 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
17:51 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
17:18 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Adam Megacz
17:07 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Bryce McKinlay
15:42 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Alexandre Oliva
15:40 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Jeff Sturm
15:13 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
14:51 java testsuite results from irix 6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:36 Re: What to do about java.version? Per Bothner
12:18 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Andrew Haley
12:17 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Andrew Haley
11:50 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
11:46 Re: What to do about java.version? Adam Megacz
11:01 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Adam Megacz

February 26, 2002
21:59 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
21:42 Re: What to do about java.version? Tom Tromey
18:41 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
17:57 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Jeff Sturm
17:45 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Jeff Sturm
16:31 Re: Fatal error, aborting. load average of 15 is too high Tom Tromey
16:27 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Bryce McKinlay
16:18 Re: Fatal error, aborting. load average of 15 is too high Bryce McKinlay
13:16 Re: What to do about java.version? Anthony Green
11:51 Re: jar installation standards Per Bothner
11:39 Re: jar installation standards Nic Ferrier
11:21 Re: jar installation standards Per Bothner
10:23 RE: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Andrew Haley
10:09 RE: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Boehm, Hans
08:46 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
08:44 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Tom Tromey
08:27 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Jeff Sturm
07:57 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Jeff Sturm
07:00 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Martin Kahlert
06:42 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Jeff Sturm
00:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Göran Thyni

February 25, 2002
23:45 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Martin Kahlert
19:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
19:36 catching exceptions in main() causes segfault? Adam Megacz
19:30 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Adam Megacz
18:21 Fatal error, aborting. load average of 15 is too high Adam Megacz
18:20 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Adam Megacz
16:56 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
15:44 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Tom Tromey
15:34 Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Bryce McKinlay
15:27 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Bryce McKinlay
15:22 Re: jar installation standards Bryce McKinlay
15:01 Re: gcj build failure Bryce McKinlay
14:56 RE: gcj build failure Pedro
14:39 RE: gcj build failure Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:25 Re: gcj build failure Tom Tromey
14:18 Re: gcj build failure Pedro
13:44 Re: gcj build failure Tom Tromey
13:30 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Adam Megacz
13:14 Re: jar installation standards Nic Ferrier
13:04 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Mark Wielaard
12:51 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Mark Wielaard
12:46 jar installation standards Per Bothner
12:42 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
12:38 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
12:35 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
12:26 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
12:07 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Goran Thyni
11:13 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
10:56 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Brian Jones
10:38 gcj build failure Pedro
09:56 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
09:40 WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions Adam Megacz
09:37 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Adam Megacz
09:14 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Jeff Sturm
08:54 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
08:32 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Alexandre Oliva
08:06 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code? Eric Blake
08:01 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Jeff Sturm
08:01 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Philip Goisman
07:55 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Tom Tromey
07:52 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code? Tom Tromey
05:34 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
05:02 Re: jni and static libgcj and friends? Martin Kahlert
01:57 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code? Andrew Haley
00:39 Re: [freenet-tech] Technology / Features Göran Thyni

February 24, 2002
22:24 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
22:17 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
22:05 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
21:46 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Jeff Sturm
19:59 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
19:45 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Bryce McKinlay
19:39 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
19:31 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
18:16 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Brian Jones
16:44 Re: proper .emacs for gcc code? Tom Tromey
16:05 Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Bryce McKinlay
14:50 proper .emacs for gcc code? Adam Megacz
12:37 Re: What to do about java.version? Per Bothner
12:18 What to do about java.version? Anthony Green
10:58 Re: Makefile problems Nic Ferrier
01:34 Makefile problems Bryce McKinlay

February 23, 2002
01:39 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Eric Blake
01:30 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Mark Wielaard

February 22, 2002
23:05 Failed to complete testsuite run in gcc-3.0.4/libjava Christian Jönsson
19:09 Re: Linux Magazine article Jeff Sturm
16:01 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
14:55 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Tom Tromey
14:54 Re: Linux Magazine article Tom Tromey
13:35 Re: build failure on darwin andreas tobler
13:31 Re: build failure on darwin Alexandre Oliva
13:29 Re: build failure on darwin andreas tobler
12:58 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Bryce McKinlay
10:42 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Mark Wielaard
10:10 build failure on darwin andreas tobler
08:10 Re: Linux Magazine article Glenn A. McAllister
08:05 jni and static libgcj and friends? Martin Kahlert
07:17 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Tom Tromey
03:32 Re: Rmi compilation to native code John Leuner

February 21, 2002
18:06 Re: Linux Magazine article Per Bothner
17:49 Linux Magazine article Anthony Green
16:33 Re: Rmi compilation to native code Bryce McKinlay
16:00 Rmi compilation to native code u_a1bargnesi

February 20, 2002
15:49 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?'] Bryce McKinlay
14:28 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?'] Adam Megacz
12:58 Re: patch in handling of finit$ Per Bothner
12:39 Re: patch in handling of finit$ Alexandre Petit-Bianco
12:03 patch in handling of finit$ Per Bothner
11:27 Re: PATCH handling of Java builtins; fixes super bytecode calls Tom Tromey
10:57 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?'] Tom Tromey
10:25 Re: Reducing static binary size [also: -ffunction-sections, and 'where did Adam go?'] Adam Megacz
07:01 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Tom Tromey
04:46 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Nic Ferrier
04:21 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Pete Chown

February 19, 2002
15:03 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Bryce McKinlay
11:42 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Tom Tromey
11:13 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Jeff Sturm
11:01 Re: Problems merging DNS JNDI code Andrew Pinski
09:40 Problems merging DNS JNDI code Pete Chown
09:27 RE: Reducing static binary size Boehm, Hans
09:08 Re: Reducing static binary size Tom Tromey
03:10 Reducing static binary size Andrew Haley

February 18, 2002
23:46 Reducing static binary size Geert Bevin
12:54 Re: CNI from apache module Bryce McKinlay
10:08 Re: CNI from apache module Per Bothner
02:22 CNI from apache module Lars Andersen
02:15 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris Jeff Sturm
00:53 PATCH handling of Java builtins; fixes super bytecode calls Per Bothner

February 17, 2002
23:31 Patch: Re: Datagram Problems Bryce McKinlay
21:23 Datagram Problems Suman Sai
21:13 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris Tom Tromey
00:36 Re: Why copy Utf8Consts? Per Bothner
00:27 Why copy Utf8Consts? Bryce McKinlay

February 16, 2002
13:00 Re: Link java object files into cpp app Bryce McKinlay
07:48 Link java object files into cpp app Lars Andersen
07:41 Re: DNS JNDI provider Brian Jones
06:23 Re: DNS JNDI provider Pete Chown
06:18 Re: DNS JNDI provider Pete Chown

February 15, 2002
21:31 Re: Datagrams - Permission Denied Error Bryce McKinlay
19:23 Datagrams - Permission Denied Error Suman Sai
13:50 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Philip Goisman
13:38 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Antonio Ake
13:27 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Jeff Sturm
12:26 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Philip Goisman
12:03 Re: DNS JNDI provider Brian Jones
12:01 Re: gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Jeff Sturm
11:14 Re: DNS JNDI provider Nic Ferrier
11:04 Re: DNS JNDI provider Tom Tromey
11:02 Re: DNS JNDI provider Tom Tromey
10:11 gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Andrew Haley
08:55 gcj on OSF1 DUX V4.0B Philip Goisman
08:23 Re: java.lang.StrictMath Andrew Haley
08:09 Re: java.lang.StrictMath Alexandre Oliva
07:38 Re: DNS JNDI provider Nic Ferrier
06:07 Re: DNS JNDI provider Pete Chown
06:06 Re: DNS JNDI provider Pete Chown
06:04 Re: DNS JNDI provider Andrew Haley
06:02 Re: DNS JNDI provider Nic Ferrier
05:59 DNS JNDI provider Andrew Haley
04:38 DNS JNDI provider Pete Chown
02:06 Re: java.lang.StrictMath Andrew Haley

February 14, 2002
23:58 Re: java.lang.StrictMath Bryce McKinlay
23:23 Re: java.lang.StrictMath Tom Tromey
23:02 Re: java.lang.StrictMath Bryce McKinlay

February 13, 2002
22:52 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Adam Megacz
20:26 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Anthony Green
19:25 Re: gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Bryce McKinlay
19:10 gcj-mingw in 3.0.4? Adam Megacz
10:56 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help Mark Mitchell
10:54 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help Anthony Green
09:28 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help Tom Tromey
09:06 RE: Thread local allocation Boehm, Hans
02:38 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris Bryce McKinlay
02:29 Re: jc1 segfaults, please help Bryce McKinlay
02:25 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris Martin Kahlert

February 12, 2002
22:05 jc1 segfaults, please help Adam Megacz
18:51 Re: Thread local allocation Bryce McKinlay
13:22 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Philip Goisman
09:51 RE: Thread local allocation Boehm, Hans
06:56 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Orth

February 11, 2002
23:24 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Alexandre Oliva
20:28 Thread local allocation Bryce McKinlay
19:13 Re: timeval == POSIX == nonportable Tom Tromey
18:42 Re: timeval == POSIX == nonportable Bryce McKinlay
18:23 timeval == POSIX == nonportable Adam Megacz
14:43 RE: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:01 Re: DNS JNDI provider and java.nio Bryce McKinlay
13:22 DNS JNDI provider and java.nio Pete Chown
12:08 java/contribute.html (was: Status of Bugzilla?) Gerald Pfeifer
10:40 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Orth

February 10, 2002
14:03 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Alexandre Petit-Bianco
12:56 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix Andreas Tobler
10:25 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix Tom Tromey
06:58 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix Andreas Tobler

February 09, 2002
08:37 Re: Patch: FYI: interpreter bug fix Andreas Tobler

February 08, 2002
19:34 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Alexandre Oliva
18:45 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Tom Tromey
16:32 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Alexandre Oliva
15:17 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 David Edelsohn
15:10 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Joe Buck
15:08 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Tom Tromey
14:21 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 David Edelsohn
14:16 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Philip Goisman
14:03 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Orth
13:23 Re: successful(?) build of libjava on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Philip Goisman
12:11 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Andreas Tobler
12:02 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Tom Tromey
10:41 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 David Edelsohn
06:52 Re: Another endianess problem on Solaris Jeff Sturm
06:07 Re: Bugs for JNI on Solaris Tom Tromey
06:00 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Andrew Haley
05:57 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Tom Tromey
05:51 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Tom Tromey
05:44 Another endianess problem on Solaris Martin Kahlert
04:59 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work Nic Ferrier
04:04 Bugs for JNI on Solaris Martin Kahlert
02:02 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Martyn Honeyford
01:55 Re: sqrt interpreter Q shudo
00:59 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work Cedric Berger

February 07, 2002
23:18 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Andreas Tobler
23:17 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Andreas Tobler
23:13 Re: testsuite question Andreas Tobler
23:11 Re: darwin and java status Andreas Tobler
22:49 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc? Adam Megacz
20:39 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc? Tom Tromey
20:33 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Tom Tromey
20:18 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Tom Tromey
20:13 initialization (again) Nic Ferrier
20:01 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Tom Tromey
18:37 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 David Edelsohn
18:21 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work Bryce McKinlay
18:18 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Bryce McKinlay
18:04 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Tom Tromey
18:02 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work Nic Ferrier
17:57 Re: testsuite question Tom Tromey
17:54 Re: darwin and java status Tom Tromey
17:50 Re: Many libjava testsuite failures on Solaris/SPARC and Intel Tom Tromey
17:48 Re: refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work Bryce McKinlay
17:34 Re: compile problem Tom Tromey
16:58 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Bryce McKinlay
16:47 Re: sqrt interpreter Q Tom Tromey
15:55 Re: compile problem Bryce McKinlay
15:29 refering to inner classes from imports doesn't work Nic Ferrier
13:05 Re: compile problem Nic Ferrier
11:35 Re: compile problem Tom Tromey
11:25 compile problem Nic Ferrier
10:33 sqrt interpreter Q Andreas Tobler
10:12 Re: Bug with JNI on Solaris (wrong function address?) Rodrigo Augusto Barbato Ferrei
09:53 Re: Bug with JNI on Solaris (wrong function address?) Tom Tromey
05:37 Bug with JNI on Solaris (wrong function address?) Martin Kahlert
03:46 GCJ problem on RS/6000 Martyn Honeyford
03:20 Re: darwin and java status Andreas Tobler
03:04 Re: darwin and java status Bryce McKinlay
03:03 Re: darwin and java status Bryce McKinlay
02:48 Re: darwin and java status Andreas Tobler
02:43 Re: darwin and java status Bryce McKinlay
02:27 Re: darwin and java status Andreas Tobler
02:00 Re: darwin and java status Andrew Haley
01:50 Re: darwin and java status Andreas Tobler

February 06, 2002
13:36 Re: testsuite question Andreas Tobler
13:27 Re: testsuite question Andrew Pinski
13:20 testsuite question Andreas Tobler
12:07 Re: darwin and java status Anthony Green
12:01 darwin and java status Andreas Tobler
11:13 Re: mingw port and Wine? Adam Megacz

February 05, 2002
19:18 mingw port and Wine? Anthony Green
13:32 Re: missing java file Matthew Bemis
13:13 Re: missing java file Tom Tromey
13:11 Re: Status of workaround for bug #4715 (Prevents compiling Classpath with 3.1) Tom Tromey
06:26 missing java file Matthew Bemis

February 04, 2002
16:25 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc? Adam Megacz
16:21 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc? Bryce McKinlay
16:15 Re: jvm wishes and gripes Bryce McKinlay
15:14 Re: relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc? Adam Megacz
14:36 Re: jvm wishes and gripes Adam Megacz
14:05 Re: nio package and asynchronous io Bryce McKinlay
13:58 Java is dead... but it could still be saved! Kevin A. Burton
12:37 Re: jvm wishes and gripes Per Bothner
12:37 Re: jvm wishes and gripes Cedric Berger
12:10 jvm wishes and gripes Adam Megacz
10:59 Re: nio package and asynchronous io Cedric Berger
10:50 Re: nio package and asynchronous io Nic Ferrier

February 03, 2002
08:28 Status of workaround for bug #4715 (Prevents compiling Classpathwith 3.1) Mark Wielaard

February 02, 2002
23:08 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Per Bothner
20:22 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Brian Jones
17:48 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? [even stranger] Adam Megacz
16:00 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? [even stranger] Bryce McKinlay
15:59 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? Bryce McKinlay
15:43 Re: crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? [even stranger] Adam Megacz
15:40 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Adam Megacz
15:25 crazy idea: gcj as a caching jit? Adam Megacz
03:33 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Nic Ferrier

February 01, 2002
23:51 Two natFile.cc questions Tom Tromey
23:32 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Tom Tromey
22:49 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Tom Tromey
17:25 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Adam Megacz
16:56 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Bryce McKinlay
16:22 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Adam Megacz
16:21 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Adam Megacz
15:40 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj? Adam Megacz
15:36 Re: jc1 segfaults? Adam Megacz
15:33 Re: jc1 segfaults? Adam Megacz
15:32 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Adam Megacz
14:23 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Bryce McKinlay
10:10 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj? Richard Henderson
10:08 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj? Andrew Haley
09:39 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Per Bothner
09:19 Re: why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj? Richard Henderson
05:55 why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj? Andrew Haley
04:40 Re: Native compilation article Tuomas Leikola
02:32 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Nic Ferrier
01:07 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Adam Megacz
00:20 why does exception.cc have "unwinding" code for sjlj? Adam Megacz


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.1