This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Speaking of runtime options
Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
> >Would a new gij (or a new option handler for the gcj tool) be useful?
> >
>
> Definately! Note that gij could be written in pure Java, unless perhaps
> there are command line options which can only be set before the runtime
> is initialized.
Ok... That's why the gij was in C++ I think. But Hans' comments about
heap settings have shown that dependancy to be spurious.
However, I have a generalized arg parser that is not getopt and is
written in C.
I can quite happily re-write the gij tool with it, and in fact any
other tools.
I'll do a gij and people can take a look.
Nic